Western Womanhood Reaches Another Huge Milestone

Western females have just reached a new high (or low, depending on how you look at it). The proverbial glass ceiling just keeps getting broken. They now finally have the important freedom to sh8t themselves live on camera, without experiencing any shame or being kept down by the patriarchal norms. Seriously:

Footage of world record holder Joanna Wietrzyk competing on Saturday showed her continuing through demanding exercises and using communal equipment, with faecal matter visibly running down her legs. The incident went viral on social media and triggered debate about Hyrox’s health and safety standards, and athlete responsibility.

I hope you'll all excuse me not posting pictures, but you can easily find them in the article quoted (this is actually a WARNING:)

The Guardian goes on to say:

It is not uncommon for athletes to soil themselves while competing in high endurance sports, particularly marathons. British athlete Paula Radcliffe won the 2005 London marathon after suffering from “runner’s diarrhoea” and having to stop at the 22-mile mark to relieve herself, in full view of cameras.

 (Emphasis mine).

Now is it "not uncommon" for all athletes or only for a "certain type" of athlete, I wonder???

So that's what I found. It happens with men, too, but according to this study, uri88ry incontinence in female athletes happens more than 5 times more often:

Prevalences were 45.1% in female compared to 14.7% male athletes (p < 0.001) such that females were 5.45 times more likely to suffer this condition.  

What about f8cal incontinence?

So this article (which appeared in the New York Times, too) does state that it affects the females more than males:

 Why does it disproportionately affect female athletes? This year, Dutch researchers published a widespread qualitative study on recreational runners who suffered from faecal incontinence.

They reported that women faced an increased risk of the issue as a result of “pelvic floor dysfunction” — the pelvic floor referring to the ‘hammock’ of muscles running from the pubic bone to the tailbone that supports the pelvic organs. 

Why would it be? The article actually does give an answer. It's because women biologically are different from men (who could have thunk it???)

In general, women face a far higher risk of pelvic floor issues due to structural anatomical differences, childbirth, and hormonal changes associated with menstruation and the menopause.

“Increased intra-abdominal pressure due to reactive forces on the pelvic floor during activities like jumping and running is believed to deform pelvic floor structures, potentially impacting continence mechanisms,” they wrote.

During the menstrual cycle, the luteal phase (the period between ovulation and the beginning of the next period) has been identified by several studies over the past 30 years as provoking more gastrointestinal problems in some women — further raising the risk of faecal incontinence during extreme exercise.

 Of course, we all know that men played sports and did all this physical activity which could lead to these kind of issues also for them, as the preparation for war, and later, when the sports became professional and commercialised, to provide for their families. And then Western women decided to do it because...because it's progress or something I guess.Welcome to the Western world, ladies and gentlemen. (I never ever want to hear another "joke" about streetsh88ters after this).

What Technology Is Doing To Your Brain

 Will we soon forget how to talk???

Lindsay Clancy Trial

 I mean what's going on really???

Online Propaganda

 How it really works nowadays;)

Considering that about 60% of all online traffic are bots, the chance is high that that troll you have been arguing with on social media is one. Some of this bot traffic is fully automatic while others are being paid to spread propaganda and disrupt discussions. This obviously includes malicious spammers and wh8rebots.

A big example of what I'm talking about can be seen on YouTube. Governments in some Western countries are getting worried about low fertility rates so they started putting out videos on this topic. Every one of them attracts the same type of comments telling you that having  children is a stupid idea, patriarchal oppression, that children will ruin your life etc. Personally I speak several languages and let me tell you, that the comments are literally the same in any of them. It's obvious that some nefarious agents are simply clogging any discussion on raising fertility in different countries with identical arguments. It can also be observed in Telegram discussions but YouTube is particularly bad lately.

Another example is how the search engine algorithms are getting rigged. If you did a search on vaccine harm pre-Covid, you'd get a variety of vaccine skeptic sites, while now you get countless government reports on how all vaccines are safe and effective. I''m sure if you start paying more attention to it, you'll find other examples as well. 

Why White Nationalism Is Stupid

Yeah, I'm going there:) 

Reason n1. Because white is not a nation, it's a race. Outside of the USA people tend to think of themselves in terms of ethnicity first. Like being Dutch, German, French, etc. Identifying themselves by racial categories first and foremost is more of an American thing really.

n2. Especially American WNs have this romantic notion of "white unity". Well, this white unity doesn't exist. One look at European history through the ages is enough to disabuse one of any such illusions, as nations which are practically cousins like the German and the French kept fighting each other for centuries. In fact, imo if European nationalists ever come to power again and kick out all non-whites, they will just go back to hating their "white brothers" from a different country as usual.

n3. "White race is  great! We created civilisation! All non-whites are stupid and barbaric!"

Ever heard of this? The truth is, human civilisation as we know it was born in the Middle East and the Mediterranean, and those folks aren't exactly "white'' the way WNs understand it. This brings me to the next claim

n4. "Whites used to be great! Christianity made them weak! We should all go back to the Viking times!" 

Great Pyramid of Giza, built around 2600 BC

 Viking Long House about 800 A.D. 

Vikings also used to raid countries like Ireland and sell their white brothers and especially sisters into slavery in the Middle East.

Christianity is what made Whites great. Now that Christianity in Europe is dying, people are reverting to the mean in rapid tempo.

n5. Used a lot on American "conservative" resources: "Europe is full of non-white immigrants! They are dying out!" The truth is that every European country is still considerably whiter that the USA. But Europeans are dying out because they refuse to reproduce, even when bribed by the government money. The most superior race on Earth has yet to figure out replacement fertility.

n6. "Whites are superior to everyone else, it's just that they are heavily brainwashed." Now, I'll be the last to deny that there is a lot of brainwashing going around, that many Western governments are downright malicious and that there are certain "nefarious agents" who are pushing their depopulation agenda very heavily. But what happened to personal responsibility? You can't be superior to everyone else and so easily duped at the same time.

n7 "All crime in White countries is only done by non-whites! White people never ever do anything wrong! Look at this immigrant, e.g!"

What happened is obviously horrible, there is no denying it. But how about this case? 

No race has monopoly on evil people. And btw, concerning the 1st case which is used by American conservative outlets yet again to attack Great Britain. This man was not an illegal immigrant, he had French nationality. Individuals with European passports have the right to stay in UK up to 6 months at a time. May be ask France, why did they decide to naturalise him? Also with a name like Kevin he is most definitely not Muslim. But then I noticed that for many American "conservatives" all foreign criminals are always Muslim, and non-whites which identify as Christians are often magically counted as Whites.

Because all Muslims are brown, right? Like this Turkish guy:

And Islam doesn't belong in Europe, because Albania and Bosnia are obviously in Africa.

n8 and this will be the last for today. "No country outside White Western Europe ever had a civilisation! White people went everywhere and civilised everyone." Like the Germans in Namibia, for instance...And let's not even talk about the British in India.

 To sum it up, every race has good and bad people and has done good and bad things. And it is Christianity which created Western Europe and later the USA and made the Western civilisation great, despite all our drawbacks. That's all for today...

Left Vs Right On "Women's Rights"

 Should be called "Women's Wrongs" really:)

Too many people still have this illusion that while "the Left" is bad and liberal, "the Right" is "based" and traditional. The truth is that the difference between the modern Left and the modern Right is more akin to the difference between Trotsky and Stalin. 

Trotsky supported women working outside home, women in the government, women in all traditionally male occupations, women in the army, easy divorce, "free s8x" plus alphabet stuff and a8ortion on demand.  

Stalin supported women working outside home, women in the government, women in all traditionally male occupations, women in the army, easy divorce, but somewhat disapproved of "free s8x'' and forbade the last two, and encouraged the wives of high state officials to stay home. So one could say he was somewhat better, but by no means traditional. 

The same is partly true about the modern Right, except that the majority of right-wingers, especially in Europe wouldn't even dream about forbidding the last two points. So the difference is essentially that they somewhat disapprove of "free s8x" and don't mind that some women stay home. Christians with traditional views simply have no representation in the modern western politics. That's just a fact.

Let's Talk Theology

 Actually, I wanted to talk about Trump's Golden Calf giant gold statue, but decided not to. It's old news by now anyway (life comes at you fast;), so let's talk theology instead.

What do you all think about Wesleyan Arminianism?

The Caribbean Crisis of the 21st Century?

was-donald-trump-blocked-from-using-the-nuclear-codes-against-iran-1

I must be the only one who is not bothered by the potential nuclear war because I kinda doubt whether the nukes really exist. I mean it's like the Caribbean crisis all over again. The story was that some brave Soviet officer refused to follow the order to launch nukes at the USA. Now it's an American general who did the same?

There is one country though which supposedly has them and wouldn't hesitate to use them, but they don't. I guess you can't launch what doesn't exist, can you? I know it's an unproven conspiracy theory but it sort of gives one the peace of mind;)

USA And Pope Leo

WT*???

If true, this explains many things. 

Is It Really So Bad?

I don't know but sounds scary. 

The Real Reason?

You will have to scroll all the way down to find it though...

Candace Owens

Interesting. 

War Pigs Are At It Again

It appears some people never learn. 

Former Prince Andrew And Other Things

 UK considers removing Andrew from the succession line. Mandelson was also arrested. Great Britain appears to be the only country where this stuff is taken seriously. Meanwhile in the land of the free...this Tucker - Huckabee interview, OMG! If that doesn't sum up everything what is wrong with this Doomsday Cult aka Dispensationalism...

Bill Gates And The Current Scandal

Several years ago, when it became known that Melinda Gates decided to divorce her husband, I distinctly remember how many men's activists blogs were all talking about "frivolous divorce'', how women are "never haaappy'' "tingles", "even rich men can't have a lasting marriage nowadays, so never marry, guys" and similar stuff. Because if the wife files for divorce, she never really can have a valid reason, right?

Well, I don't know, may be their divorce had something to do with this:

Bill Gates has issued a forceful denial of allegations made by convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein claiming the Microsoft co-founder contracted a sexually transmitted disease from Russian women and secretly provided antibiotics to his then-wife Melinda. The claims surfaced Thursday (January 30) as part of a massive document release by the U.S. Department of Justice.

The allegations appear in draft emails Epstein sent to himself in July 2013, which appear to be written from the perspective of Boris Nikolic, Gates' longtime science adviser at the time. According to the Daily Mail, the emails claim Nikolic helped Gates "get drugs, in order to deal with consequences of sex with russian girls" and was asked to provide antibiotics that Gates could "surreptitiously give to Melinda."

 
Funny, it appears that Melinda did give a reason for the marital split at that time, which you wouldn't know about from reading the Manosphere (I didn't):

 Gates and Melinda divorced in 2021 after 27 years of marriage. Melinda has cited her ex-husband's relationship with Epstein as one factor in the split. Melinda hired divorce lawyers in 2019 after learning about Gates' repeated meetings with the convicted pedophile.

Not-so-frivolous after all, eh? Many of these activists are just as toxic as feminists and probably sponsored and encouraged by the same people, with one objective: to prevent family formation and further suppress the birth rates. And if you are at all social media savvy, you should have figured out by now who is really behind it.

Friends Do Not Steal From Friends

You know what I mean.

Faces Of Feminism: The Good, The Bad And...The Ugly?

Facebook must be some sort of spyware. I don't even have a Facebook account yet it somehow managed to find me and to push me some sort of short story (in Dutch) which I then got hooked on and ended up reading all of it. And that is what I want to talk about today.

It starts with a woman throwing her partner's teenage son's dirty laundry out of the window and declaring that she is not a cook and not a maid and is not going to take care of him any more. Let his father do it. The boy and his father then stage some sort of protest and keep leaving food and dirty dishes everywhere until she decides to kick them out. 

Women below in the comments applauded (predictably).

The story left me wondering. There are so many details we don't know. First, they are evidently not married since she says something along the lines of deciding to live together with a man, not his son. (This is her first mistake). The story insinuates strongly that both he and his son are freeloaders (the son plays computer games the whole day), yet if the man is such a loser why on Earth did she move together with him? Whose house is it? Presumably hers since in the end she decides to change the locks. But again, something in that particular guy must have attracted her in the first place, didn't it? 

Does she work? Does the guy work? Who is the main breadwinner? Why did the son move with them in the first place? How old is he really?

There are a couple scenarios which come into my mind. Number one, the guy is a total moocher who moves into her house and sponges off her while not contributing financially and refusing to do any housework and then invites his son who is just such another. In this situation, her reaction is understandable but her decision to let him in in the first place is not. In fact, it portrays her as a total idiot (sorry) who finally gets some sense, not a victim of some imaginary patriarchy or whatever the story tried to convey.

Or may be it's an average couple (what passes for family nowadays) where the woman works slightly less hours than the guy and thus does laundry and cooking (and the guy, in fact, asks her since she already did it for him, why would she refuse to do it for his son). Then the son probably quarrels with his mother and decides to move in with the father and his new girlfriend. If we presume that his father provides for him what then is the lady's problem? Her children aren't mentioned at all so she probably has none. 

Why on Earth can't she be more maternal and show some love to a troubled teenage boy (I think the story mentions that he is still at school so he can't be really that old), especially since she is already in love with his father? While women of other cultures pride themselves on being hospitable, caring and maternal, Western women apparently should pride themselves on being total b8tches nothing of the sort.

But then, a decent woman from a traditional culture wouldn't have moved in with a man she wasn't married to. Her family wouldn't have allowed her to...

For My Reader From Texas

Well, it took me some time but I finally did check your links yesterday evening. 

For the record, here they are:

Legion of Men

Pearl Davis

https://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/68-percent-of-americans-consider-the-condition-of-the-economy-to-be-poor-as-millions-of-u-s-consumers-reach-their-breaking-points

Just a couple of thoughts. Concerning the 1st video, I really had no idea that Americans have it so bad. What about your president fixing economy and stuff? Compared to this, we still have more or less decent life over here, even people who live on welfare and can't afford a car. 

As for Pearl, yeah, I'm not a big fan of her but as I'm lazy I won't do any fact checking and just take what she says about divorce at face value. There are two things I'd like to point out. First, despite the American divorce system which she criticises, according to her statistics, Hindus and Muslims somehow manage to have pretty low divorce rates which means that you still can have a normal family even with easy divorce laws. Which really makes it shameful for Christians to divorce so much. Especialy considering that Islam allows divorce and Christianity forbids it.

However, and this is my 2nd point. If you are a Christian, please keep in mind that if you want to have licit s8x and avoid fornication, marriage is your only option. And if you really don't want to marry, it's fine. Just stay single and celibate (or at least try to). Again, our divorce system is different and men do pretty well in it, BTW, the divorce rates started climbing in the 1990s when married women started working en masse. There was even scientific research which proved that the more hours the woman works the higher her chance of divorce. So make your own conclusions.

Your last link is more like the summary of the first video. 

I do appreciate the discussion so feel free to express your thoughts in the comments below:)

Who Are Redditors

 Interesting. Very interesting. Makes one think, doesn't it?

Living Together Before Marriage Doesn't Work

 Here's why:

 If there’s one thing that ought to lead people to Christianity, it’s the proven ability of the Christian moral rules to guide believers away from the sins that destroy them. A lot of modern “Christians” have reduced Christianity to being about their feelings and their community, while allowing the culture to determine their goals and moral boundaries. But that won’t protect them from danger.