I can understand his mother's indignation:
"I was outraged at that comment to be honest," she admitted. "He can wear a skirt but he's not allowed to wear shorts.
Yet isn't there a whiff of hypocrisy:
"He's a boy, he doesn't want to wear a skirt...He identifies as a male..."
If skirts/dresses are distinctly female clothes which aren't suitable for boys/males to wear, while pants and shorts are for men, then why most Western women wear them and not dresses?
5 The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God.
This cross-dressing didn't start in the current year, if you know what I mean. We just decided one day that the rules didn't apply to women the same way they applied to men. Present day progressives just take the equality idea to its logical end...