Wednesday, May 17, 2023

Martha Stewart And Swimsuit Cover

Thoughts on the  issue:

She looks quite decent for her age.

To present a woman as old as her as a s8x symbol is ridiculous.

In a traditional society, no woman of any age would be on a publicly available magazine cover in these types of "clothes"

Western women will seize any opportunity to get (nearly) naked in public.



  1. I've always loved Jane Seymour and Lynda Carter. The sad thing is for me I almost get excited seeing an attractive not obese female even if she is in her 60s or 70s at times.

    Martha does have a youthful face for her age.

    Some of these women in their 40s and 50s on these dating apps look like they have been rode hard and hung up wet. :LOL:

  2. I agree Martha is very pleasant-looking.

  3. She is just well snip, tuck and airbrushed. She hardly looks like that when she gets out of bed. Also the loss of muscle mass in her thighs is terrible, old people should avoid that at any cost. That is where we start loosing muscle first, and then people start falling and broking their hips.

    I really, really cannot understand why women cannot keep their clothes on and have some dignity, especially when aging.

    Funny thing, I have lately been thinking about a lot, wether modesty means anything when we age and loose our charms. Now I realize, that it is even more important. Modesty is not only about not letting men have lustful thoughts: it is even more about protecing your grace and dignity. And those are more and more important, the older we get. Young ladies can get over almost anything, because they are fresh and pretty, but when aging, grace and dignity are the only things you have left.

  4. I'm constantly amazed at the outfits professing Christian women are wearing nowadays. Even in pagan cultures like Rome women covered themselves. The only females going around skimpy dressed were slaves, and yes, it designated their status as freely s8xually available.