Which one (apart from Flat Earth) is the most ridiculous conspiracy in your point of view? For me it's that Michelle Obama (or any other masculine looking woman for that matter) is a man.
I simply don't believe it! What about you?
Not sure if it is the most ridiculous, but I really loathe the Michelle Obama one. And it's not because I like her. I don't.
Yeah, it's stupid! Now about Ms Griner, I watched the vids and honestly, I do have my doubts...Though it probably can be explained by taking steroids?
I'm not really sure about Michelle or Michael as Obama calls her. I'm going to disagree with you on this one. There are no photos of 'Michelle' being pregnant and no women admitting to have sex with Obama over the years. Of course, there are no known women admitting to sex with Republican 'Sissy' Graham of North Carolina, so my metric could be wrong. I don't get the flat earth stuff though there is a bunch of weird stuff going on in Antarctica. Why would John Kerry or a priest of the Eastern Orthodox church go down there for a visit? These visits were some time ago and there were other well known people.
Texan, I know it sounds strange but there are men out there who only have ever had sex with their own wives. Wasn't Cavanaugh one of them? And were Obamas even famous when Michelle was pregnant? Some women may simply dislike the way they look when visibly pregnant and wouldn't want any such photos made public.As for Flat earth well I have a book about it but not really convinced:) Though it did look flat from a plane window as far as I remember:) I never heard about Ortho priest going to Antarctica or John Kerry for that matter! Strange...
Oh yes, what do you folks think of the mud flood???
My biggest problem with this theory is where are the written news stories or diaries that would have survived? This would have been a cataclysmic event and it's hard to believe no one would bother writing something down or a lot of something about it. I find the chosen pictures of no people in the streets intriguing based on the correct idea that it is visibly midday or afternoon, but those can be cherry picked. The streets do seem in bad shape relative to the structures of chosen pictures. And how would these structures have been built? We have pictures of the US Capital construction and the Texas capito. building in Austin, Texas.
There are no people in earliest pictures because exposure likely lasted days:"several days of exposure in the camera were needed to adequately capture such an image" "Samuel Morse was astonished to learn that daguerreotypes of the streets of Paris did not show any people, horses or vehicles, until he realized that due to the long exposure times all moving objects became invisible. Within a few years, exposures had been reduced to as little as a few seconds by the use of additional sensitizing chemicals and "faster" lenses such as Petzval's portrait lens, the first mathematically calculated lens. "Check this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nic%C3%A9phore_Ni%C3%A9pceand this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Daguerre
Ah, see, now I have some information to work with.