Recently I read a discussion on UTube where women were complaining that men don't want to protect them any more. They were discussing a case when a young woman was being robbed of her iPhone by an armed minority criminal and no man jumped to her help. Men quite sensibly pointed out what happened to Daniel Penny and also that women are strong and independent nowadays and were quite predictably accused of "not being real men".
A real man, said one of the females in the chat, is this strong courageous masculine guy who defends women and children, even at the cost of his own life, and they have all but disappeared nowadays. When somebody asked her about real women, she got very upset and said some gibberish about ''real women being true to themselves", i.e. a narcissist, as someone correctly pointed out.
They all want men who do something for them without any reciprocation apparently.
My sympathy fully lies with men about this issue. Why should they risk death or prison for an I-phone of some stranger female with an entitlement attitude (she actually tried to shame some poor guy into helping her). May be the lack of "real men" is caused by the lack of real women?
You know, women who look and behave feminine, can cook and clean, have a maternal instinct, are chaste and not covered with tattoos from head to toes? And stay faithful to their husbands/don't divorce on a whim?
The reason those internet scolds can't find a real man is because all these real men are out there hanging with real women, getting married to them and having kids with them. They aren't at all attracted to someone who calls them "incels" who "can't get laid". Shaming language simply doesn't work in A.D. 2024. Chivalry is officially dead and women have only themselves to blame.
Well said.
ReplyDeleteI have no problem telling libtard women that if you are kidnapped by some 'illegal gun toting rapist illegal immigrants' and never come back, I'm happy about. I refuse to defend any woman who supports gun control, votes left, and cheers for the sub humans let in across the border. Nothing makes me happier than a leftard whether male or female who is offed by one of their own dumb-versity pets in a violent manner. They voted for it.
ReplyDeleteThese same women want a 'masculine guy' unless he is a Trump supporter or does not subscribe to any of the libtard stupidity. Why should I as a male vote for people who make me poorer and disenfranchise me and want to disarm me?
Women: We want to make more money than men!
ReplyDeleteSociety: Okay, we'll stack the deck against men hard enough to put you ahead.
Women: We want to date men who make more money than us!
Society: There aren't many of them left but here they are.
Women: WHY DO THEY MAKE MORE MONEY THAN US!!?!
Society: We'll tax them to bring them down to your level.
Women: Where have all the good men gone?
;)
ReplyDeleteSorry just came back home
Those women should realize, that chivalry DOES exist. It just isn't applied to them. Men have never, ever been chivalrous towards those women who were not concidered to deserve it: sluts, harlots, milkmades etc.
ReplyDeleteIn short, chivalry was for ladies. And still is.
Also, lower class men were never chivalrous. In modern days we are lucky, because even blue-collar men can be nowadays, as long as woman is a lady.
Well, there was a time not so long ago when men were generally inclined to give most women the benefit of the doubt. They would open the doors for them etc. But, no more...
ReplyDeleteI mean I still open doors for women, but that's mainly an ingrained muscle memory rather than because they are women. As for the stepping up in defense, if the women in question is my wife/girlfriend, a friend of mine, or kin. Well lets just say its a much harder decision than it was 10 years ago.
ReplyDeleteThe event that I think really pushed me over the edge was a combination of two events. About 10 years ago there was a bunch of young women holding a large welcome refugees sign in Germany, and then a few months later there was a massive attack in Dresden I think it was, where a few hundred Africans were attacking and getting grabby with German women in an open square and most of the women in question refused to press any charges afterwards because they didn't want to be seen as being racist. At that point I kind of started joining the let women suffer to consequences of their own actions, and nothing I have seen sense has done anything to counter that opinion.
- W
edit on my comment. (if the woman in question is not, my wife/girlfriend ...) I can't believe I missed the not. I clearly am not awake yet.
ReplyDelete- W
Well, obviously a normal man would still defend his wife or girlfriend;)
ReplyDeleteAs for the rest, I read about the cases when a man would jump up to defend a woman getting a beatdown from her violent boyfriend and she would call police on him...
BTW I have noticed that men haven't lost their ability to tell by woman's appearances wether she is real woman or not.
ReplyDeleteSo if a woman wants to be on the safe side, she can just choose to look the role and voilá, chivalry is there.
But noooooo, it won't do. They want to look like sluts and be treated like ladies simultaneously.
I agree. Mothers of young children usually get respect, too. Chivalry is actually all about defending the woman's honour. Woman's honour is chastity. Before s8xual revolution, women by default were presumed to be chaste (unless she was a known pr8stitute), now not so much.
ReplyDeleteTo be fair it was also easier to know back then as for one most folks didn't really move around too much, families would stay bunched together in the same town or province. And second a lot of women are terrible gossips and would tell on the pr8stitutes. Shaming tactics worked wonders back then to keep people from acting like degenerates in public.
Delete-W
There is no shaming nowadays because in the formerly Christian countries the default situation for women is to be s8xually active, whether married or not.
ReplyDelete