Happy Thanksgiving to my American friends!
But you aren't allowed to point it out in the land of freedom and democracy:
The French media regulator has fined the conservative channel CNews €100,000 for, during a Catholic programme, saying that abortion is the world’s leading cause of death. The episode reveals the extent to which the debate on abortion is deadlocked in France.
In February 2024, presenter Aymeric Pourbaix, during the Catholic programme “En quĂȘte d’esprit,” broadcast every Sunday on the conservative channel CNews, showed an infographic on the causes of death, ranking abortion as the leading cause, with 73 million deaths each year worldwide. That translates to 52% of annual deaths, far ahead of cancer (10 million) and smoking (6.2 million).
Even if you don't believe in God, but believe in "science'' instead, a society which kills its young on an industrial scale is evolutionary not fit to survive.
Just a thought on all the recent s8x scandals. Rich and powerful men have always, always been polygamous. Why? Because they can afford it. Yet we are supposed to faint like a Victorian old maid because some of them (gasp) visited wh8res and (gasp) paid for s8x and (bring me my smelling salts, quick, I can't take it any more) cheated on their wives.
I would take this new puritanism much more seriously if it didn't proceed from the society which promotes the most degenerate sh8t since the fall of Rome. I also notice that they usually target men with these wild accusations who in some way are dangerous for the system (like Julian Assange) while totally ignoring identical behaviour in others.
The process itself is the punishment.
DISCLAIMER:
Of course, I don't approve of such unladylike behaviour;))) And the word choice.
but this is really funny:
Found on Twitter/X
Not necessarily. Unless you eat a whole lot of them:
The average American consumes more than 3,600 calories daily – a 24% increase from 1961, when the average was just 2,880 calories.
Americans haven't increased their consumption of all food and drink evenly, however — our alcohol intake peaked in the 1980s, but our growing consumption of vegetable oils alone accounts for more than half of the calorie spike.
The article is from 2017 but I doubt the situation has improved. For the record, your daily caloric intake is supposed to be much lower:
Recently I got this comment:
Hello Sanne. This morning I was recalling several blog posts you wrote
about ( some) Christians thinking they must wear "Prairie Clothes,
homestead, etc." in order to be a proper Christian. They were along
these lines, anyway .
Would you be willing to write more on this?
...Part of what I've come through is just that type of thinking , that in
order to do it "right" I must look a certain way or do certain things
within my family.
I see more clearly now, Glory to God, but online I still see so much of this.
I would love to hear more of your thoughts
You see, it's difficult to write on this topic because if you go into too much detail as by giving examples of what you mean, you are sure to offend both those to the left and to the right of you:) But I will try.
First of all, one should keep in mind that most anyone with some presence online such as a blog/twitter/facebook account etc is an influencer (that includes me as I'm trying to influence people to question feminism and other things). There is nothing wrong with it, of course, but most influencers will try to earn either by selling you a product or by trying to influence your politics which they are often paid for, or in some other way.
A lot of them are good, sincere people who believe in what they say, but some are more nefarious or downright grifters.
People say that social media is like a town square where you can exchange your opinions, but it's not entirely true because when I'm exchanging opinions with my neighbours in real life, they aren't trying to constantly sell me something, or telling me for which candidate to vote.
That is something to keep in mind when dealing with internet personalities, especially famous ones with a lot of followers.
What does it have to do with Christianity, you ask. Well, it's true for the Christian influencers as well. Except that they often will try not only to influence your politics, but your theology as well. Simply put, they'll often try to persuade you that their brand of Christianity is the only correct one and you have to do things exactly their way, otherwise you are a bad Christian or even not saved at all.
The most important division in the Christian world is between Roman Catholics/Eastern Orthodox (these churches are quite similar in doctrine though their adherents will often fight with each other online) and Protestants. Theological division between these two traditions is very wide and both sides consider each other heretics (though most will be too polite to admit it).
Protestants in theory all have similar beliefs, and yet they fight even more between themselves that Catholics and Orthodox.
Now I'm not talking about liberals over here, those who believe in ordination of women, or deny the inerrancy of the Scriptures. This is quite another can of worms, and I hope that my readers are all Bible believing Christians.
However, even among more right wing denominations there is a lot of division over doctrinal issues, and, of course, you'll see it online. For instance, some churches believe that vaccination is not Biblical. While others don't have any teaching about this. Personally I believe that this issue falls under Christian freedom.
There are things in the Bible which are quite clear, like the 10 Commandments. And there are some things which aren't addressed at all, like what TV show it's OK to watch. I believe God gave us brains and the capability to discern Good and Evil so that we would use it for these "grey areas" of life.
If you belong to a certain church it appears natural to me that you will follow it's doctrine, but you'll use your discernment capabilities to see if this church isn't falling into open heresy (which happens much too often nowadays). Also, women have men in their life (husbands, fathers, brothers) to ask questions about these things, however, I do believe in the freedom of conscience. A woman can have very strong convictions about some things being sinful which her husband doesn't share (like wearing short skirts). If it's absolutely against your conscience to do something, I believe it overrides earthy authorities.
So while Christians are supposed to live in a certain way as the Bible teaches (or their understanding of it) they have a considerable freedom to choose their politics, their diet, medical treatment for their families, whether to live in a city or in the country, how to educate their children etc, using their discernment, of course, and not compromising their faith.
That's the way I see it personally.
Is there a connection?
Yesterday it was Armistice/Veteran's Day (in the USA). We don't celebrate it in my country because we had good sense not to fight.
The main result of "the war to end all wars" was the destruction of the European Christian civilisation, but also the fall of European monarchies, Weimar Republic and the female emancipation, of course. We all know about flappers with their short skirts and short hair, but it really started during the war itself, when women started working in factories (because men left for the front), and driving ambulances under enemy fire to prove a point. There was also that shameful white feather campaign for which the British government rewarded women with the voting rights (still restricted for some time, if I remember correctly).
Well, our men didn't leave, so our women didn't work in those factories and we could keep our traditional way of life a little bit longer. We also didn't sacrifice the whole generation of young men for the imperial ambitions.
Sometimes the only way to win is not to fight.
I changed my email address. I mostly used to get spam at my old address, plus emails from the admin that they are going to block my account. I'm not sure you could even contact me through it any more.
My new address is
SanneWt@proton.me
You can also find it in my profile
Looking forward to hearing from you soon:)
As Christians, we have a surfeit of evidence that anger can indeed be righteous. Scripture tells us that God is both slow to anger and that His wrath is quickly kindled depending on the circumstance, but both acknowledge the reality of holy anger. And Jesus Christ, the only perfect and sinless man, felt and even acted in anger on several occasions towards money-changers and Pharisees. To call anger inherently sinful is therefore an explicit denial of God’s Word and condemnation of His character.
Read the whole article over here
My prediction: D.Trump will win. I can be mistaken, of course.We'll see tomorrow, I guess.
Some of its side effects:
Additionally, animal studies suggest Ozempic has the potential to cause thyroid cancer, which may lead to lumps in the throat and dysphagia. It's important to be aware of these potential risks and consult your healthcare provider if you experience any severe symptoms.
Never mind though, they say it happens "rarely" and they "don't know" if it really causes cancer so it must be OK then I guess.